Publication year: 2021
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON 87427 x MON 87460 x MON 89034 x 1507 x MON 87411 x 59122 and subcombinations, from TESTBIOTECH Background 7 – 3 – 2021 2021 Testbiotech_Comment_MON87427 x MON87460 x MON89034 x 1507 x MON87411 x 59122.pdf
Nobelpreis für die Büchse der Pandora (Zeitschrift ÖKOLOGIE & LANDBAU 01/2021) 2021 Ökologie_und_Landbau_Then_2021.pdf
Risikobewertung gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen in der EU: Ein Blick auf die dunkle Seite des Mondes TESTBIOTECH Background (Januar 2021) 2021 Testbiotech_Hintergrund_ Dunkle_Seiten_der_Risikoprüfung.pdf
Risk assessment of GE plants in the EU: Taking a look at the ‘dark side of the moon’ Testbiotech Report, January 2021 2021 Testbiotech_dark_side_of_the_moon.pdf

Publication year: 2020
Testbiotech comment on EFSA opinion regarding insect‐resistant and herbicide‐tolerant soybean DAS-81419-2 × DAS-44406-6 TESTBIOTECH Background 20 – 12 -2020 2020 Testbiotech_comment_soybean DAS-81419-2 x DAS-44406-6.pdf
Synergistic effects between Bt toxins and plant constituents (proteinase inhibitors, PI) multiply toxicity of GE plants (December 2020) TESTBIOTECH Background 17 – 12 – 2020 2020 Testbiotech Background_ Bt plants and protease inhibitors.pdf
Why ‘New GE’ needs to be regulated Frequently Asked Questions on ‘New Genetic Engineering’ and technical backgrounds for CRISPR & Co 2020 Frequently_asked_questions_about_CRISPR_and_Co.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Statement „Towards a scientifically justified, differentiated regulation of genome edited plants in the EU“ published by Leopoldina, DFG and German Academies of Sciences and Humanities TESTBIOTECH Background 30 – 9 – 2020 2020 Testbiotech_background_statement_leopoldina_dfg_2020.pdf
Warum die Neue Gentechnik strikt reguliert werden muss Fragen, Antworten und wissenschaftliche Hintergründe zu CRISPR & Co 2020 Fragen_Antworten_und_Fakten_CRISPR_und_Co.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel´s Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-RX-002) from Bayer/ Monsanto TESTBIOTECH Background 30 – 8 – 2020 2020 TBT comment_GT73_renewal.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MZIR098 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2017-142) by Syngenta 2020 Testbiotech_Comment_MZIR098.pdf
Peer-reviewed publications authored by Testbiotech experts or resulting from projects supported by Testbiotech (July 2020) 2020 Peer_review_publications_Testbiotech_2020_02.pdf
Testbiotech input to EFSA consultation on Synbio micro-organisms (June 2020) 2020 Testbiotech_Background_SynBio_micro-organisms_2020.pdf
Genetic engineering endangers the protection of species Why the spread of genetically engineered organisms into natural populations has to be prevented Christoph Then 2020 Genetic engineering endangers protection of species.pdf

Publication year: 2020
L’ingénierie génétique, une menace pour la protection des espèces Ou, de la nécessité d’empêcher la propagation des organismes génétiquement manipulés dans les populations naturelles Christoph Then 2020 2020_Ingénierie_génétique.pdf
Testbiotech Background: Comment on EFSA draft document on risk assessment of plants developed with Type 1 (SDN-1) and Type 2 (SDN-2) site-directed nucleases and oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis (ODM) (May 2020) 2020 TBT_Background_on_SDN_Consultation.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON88017 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-RX-014) from Bayer/Monsanto (April 2020) 2020 Testbiotech_Comment_MON88017_renewal_final.pdf
Overview of genome editing applications using SDN-1 and SDN-2 in regard to EU regulatory issues New methods of genetic engineering (genome editing) and their potential impact on nature protection and the environment 2020 Overview of genome editing applications using SDN-1 and SDN-2 in regard to EU regulatory issues.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered soybean SYTH0H2 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2012-111) by Syngenta TESTBIOTECH Background 20 – 2 -2020 2020 Testbiotech_Comment_SYTH0H2_fin.pdf
Technical background for a request for internal review against the decision of the EU Commission to renew the market authorisation for genetically engineered soybean MON 89788 (application EFSA-GMO-RX-011) 2020 Technical background for requesting internal review of decision on renewal_of soybean_MON89788.pdf
Technical background for a request for internal review against the decision of the EU Commission to renew the market authorisation for genetically engineered soybean A2704-12 (application EFSA-GMO-RX-009) 2020 Technical background for requesting internal review of the decision for renewal_soybean_A2704_12.pdf
Gentechnik gefährdet unsere Lebensgrundlagen! Eine Streitschrift zu zehn Jahren Testbiotech 2020 Gentechnik_gefaehrdet_unsere_Lebensgrundlagen.pdf
Zusammenfassender Abschlussbericht des Projektes RAGES, 2016-2019 2020 Zusammenfassender Abschlussbericht des Projektes RAGES.pdf
Summary report of the results from the RAGES project 2016-2019 Andreas Bauer-Panskus, Thomas Bohn, Janet Cotter, Angelika Hilbeck, Erik Millstone, Christoph Then, Helen Wallace, Brian Wynne 2020 Summary report RAGES.pdf

Publication year: 2020
RAGES subreport: Serious shortcomings in the European risk assessment of herbicide tolerant GE plants for human health Thomas Bøhn, Christoph Then, Andreas Bauer-Panskus, Juliana Miyazaki, Nicolas Defarge, Tamara Lebrecht and Angelika Hilbeck 2020 Rages_report_ GE HT Plants.pdf
RAGES subreport: Insecticidal Bt crops. EFSA’s risk assessment approach for GM Bt plants fails by design Angelika Hilbeck, Nicolas Defarge, Tamara Lebrecht, Thomas Bøhn 2020 RAGES_report-Insecticidal Bt plants.pdf, RAGES_report Insecticidal Bt plants – annex-1.pdf, RAGES_report Insecticidal Bt plants – annex-2.pdf, RAGES_report Insecticidal Bt plants – annex-3.pdf
RAGES subreport: Health risk assessment of genetically engineered nutritionally-altered GM crops Helen Wallace, Christoph Then 2020 RAGES_report- GE plants with nutritional changes.pdf
RAGES subreport: Assessment of health risks associated with the consumption of products derived from genetically engineered plants with a combination of traits Christoph Then, Andreas Bauer-Panskus, Juliana Miyazaki, Janet Cotter, Tamara Lebrecht and Thomas Bøhn 2020 RAGES_report- combinatorial effects.pdf
RAGES subreport: Environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered crops that can persist and spontaneously propagate in the environment Andreas Bauer Panskus, Juliana Miyazaki, Christoph Then 2020 RAGES_report- next generation effects.pdf
RAGES subreport: New genetic engineering technologies Janet Cotter, Katharina Kawall, Christoph Then 2020 RAGES_report- new genetic engineering techniques.pdf
Tabled overview on cross cutting gaps and deficiencies in current risk assessment as currently performed in the EU and Switzerland Annex II to the summary report of the results from the RAGES project 2020 RAGES_Tabled overview gaps in current risk assessment.pdf
Gentechnik gefährdet den Artenschutz Warum die Ausbreitung gentechnisch veränderter Organismen in den natürlichen Populationen verhindert werden muss Christoph Then 2020 Gentechnik_Artenschutz_2020.pdf
Overview: the RAGES project 2020 RAGES_ Factsheet_Overview.pdf
Überblick: das RAGES-Projekt 2020 Überblick: das RAGES-Projekt.pdf

Publication year: 2019
What is (not) genetic engineering? It is often claimed that new genetic engineering methods like CRISPR/Cas only do what continuously happens in nature anyway. Is this really true? 2019 TBT_what_is_not_genetic_eng.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered soybean MON87751 x MON87701 x MON87708 x MON89788 by Bayer/Monsanto TESTBIOTECH Background 08 – 12 -2019 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON87751 x MON87701 x MON87708 x MON89788_fin.pdf
Testbiotech comment on ‘Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-UK-2006-34) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified maize 3272’ by company Syngenta TESTBIOTECH Background 4 – 12 – 2019 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize_3272_compl.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MIR604 for renewal authorisation from Syngenta TESTBIOTECH Background 8 – 12 – 2019 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MIR_604_Renewal.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON87427 x MON89034 x MIR162 x MON87411 and subcombinations from Bayer/Monsanto TESTBIOTECH Background 8 – 12 – 2019 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON87427 x MON89034 x MIR 162 x MON87411_v2.pdf
Differences between conventional breeding and genetic engineering: An assessment of the statement made by the Group of Chief Scientific Advisors’ (SAM) TESTBIOTECH Background 04 – 12 – 2019 2019 TBT analysis of SAM_2018.pdf
Broschüre: Was ist (keine) Gentechnik? Oft wird behauptet, neue Gentechnikverfahren wie CRISPR würden nichts anderes machen als das, was in der Natur ohnehin ständig passiert. Stimmt das? 2019 TBT_Broschüre_Was_ist_keine_Gentechnik.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON 87427 x MON87460 x MON 89034 x MIR162 x NK603 and subcombinations (application EFSA-GMO-NL- 2016-131) from Bayer / Monsanto (October 2019) 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON87427 x MON87460 x MON89034 x MIR 162 x NK 603_v2.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON 87427 x MON 89034 x MIR162 x NK603 and subcombinations (August 2019) 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON87427xMON89034xMIR162xNK603.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered soybean MON 87708 x MON 89788 x A5547-127 (August 2019) 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON87708 x MON89788x A5547-127_v2.pdf

Publication year: 2019
Testbiotech comment on the IUCN report “Genetic frontiers for conservation, an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation” TESTBIOTECH Background 3 – 7 – 2019 2019 Testbiotech_comment_on_IUCN_report_synthetic biology.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x 1507 x 5307 x GA21 and subcombinations (May 2019) 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x 1507 x 5307x GA21.pdf
Technical background for a request for internal review against the decision of the EU Commission to give market authorisation to stacked maize MON 87427 x MON 89034 x 1507 x MON 88017 x 59122 and subcombinations (January 2019) 2019 Technical background for request of revision decision_SmartStax_ 3.pdf
Am I Regulated? Neue Gentechnik an Pflanzen: Probleme mangelnder Regulierung am Beispiel der USA 2019 Am_I_Regulated_de.pdf
Am I Regulated? The US example: why new methods of genetically engineering crop plants need to be regulated 2019 Am_I_Regulated_en_n.pdf
Die „Gentechnik-Mais-Monster“ der Industrie TESTBIOTECH Hintergrund 26 – 02 – 2019 2019 Hintergrund _SmartStax_4 Herbizide_fin_v4.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON 89034 x 1507 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and sub-combinations TESTBIOTECH Background 15 – 02 – 2019 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON 89034 x 1507 x NK603 x DAS40278-9.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA’s assessment of genetically engineered maize MON 89034 x 1507 x MON 88017 x 59122 x DAS-40278-9 and sub-combinations TESTBIOTECH Background 13 – 02 – 2019 2019 Testbiotech_Comment_MON 89034 x 1507 x MON 88017 x 59122 x DAS40278-9_v2.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the EFSA assessment of genetically engineered soybean A2704-12 for renewal 2019 Testbiotech comment_renewal_soybean_A2704_12.pdf

Publication year: 2018
Testbiotech comment on ‘Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 89788 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-RX-011)’ by company Monsanto TESTBIOTECH Background 18 – 12 – 2018 2018 Testbiotech comment_renewal_soybean_MON89788.pdf
Testbiotech comment on ‘Assessment of genetically modified maize MZHG0JG for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2016-133)’ by company Syngenta TESTBIOTECH Background 14 – 12 – 2018 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize_MZHG0JG.pdf
Gentechnik-Soja in Südamerika Flächenverbrauch, Pestizideinsatz und die Folgen für die globalen Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung 2018 Sojaanbau_Suedamerika.pdf
New methods of genetic engineering: GENE-DRIVE-MOSQUITOS (TESTBIOTECH Background 17 – 9 – 2018 ) A possible future scenario 2018 Questions_and_Answers_Gene-Drive-Moskitos.pdf
Neue Gentechnik: GENE-DRIVE-MOSKITOS (TESTBIOTECH Hintergrund 17 – 9 – 2018) Ein mögliches Zukunftsszenario 2018 Fragen_und_Antworten_zu_Gene-Drive-Mücken.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically engineered cotton GHB614xT304-40xGHB119 for food and feed uses, import and processing (EFSA-GMO-NL-2014-122) of company Bayer 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Cotton_GBH614xT304xGBH119.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s opinion on the assessment of genetically engineered soybean MON 87751 for food and feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2014–121) by company Monsanto 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Mon87751.pdf
Rechtsgutachten „Modelle zur Finanzierung vorsorgeorientierter Risikoforschung im Bereich der Gen- und Biotechnologie“ 2018 Forschung_Finanzierung_April_2017_final.pdf
Testbiotech comment on Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87411 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2015-124) of company Monsanto 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize Mon87411.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s opinion on the assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 x MIR162 x 1507 x GA21 and three subcombinations 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize Bt11xMIR162x1507xGA21_fin.pdf

Publication year: 2018
Comments on the Commission proposal to amend Regulation178/2002 (July 2018) Legal analysis and suggestions by Professor Ludwig Krämer, commissioned by Testbiotech, Germany 2018 Comments on the Commissons proposal Regulation 178_2002_Kraemer.pdf
New methods of genetic engineering: The ‘CRISPR Mushroom’ (TESTBIOTECH Background 18 – 7 – 2018 ) A possible future scenario 2018 Questions & Answers_CRISPR_Mushroom.pdf
Neue Gentechnik: Der „CRISPR-Pilz“ (TESTBIOTECH Hintergrund 18 – 7 – 2018) Ein mögliches Zukunftsszenario 2018 Fragen_und_Antworten_zum _CRISPR_Pilz.pdf
Unterschiede: Genome Editing und Mutagenese (kommentierte Fassung) 2018 Tabelle Vergleich CRISPR & Mutagenese_kommentierte Fassung.pdf
Kommentar zum “Entwurf einer Verordnung über die Sicherheitsstufen und Sicherheitsmaßnahmen bei gentechnischen Arbeiten in gentechnischen Anlagen (GentechnikSicherheitsverordnung – GenTSV)” 2018 Testbiotech_Stellungnahme_Entwurf_GenTSV.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified maize 4114 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2014-123) of company Pioneer (DowDupont) 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize 4114.pdf
Genome Editing: Increasing monopolisation in agriculture and breeding Patents can also impact conventional breeding 2018 Background Patents & Genome Editing.pdf
Neue Gentechnikverfahren: zunehmende Monopolisierung von Landwirtschaft und Züchtung (TESTBIOTECH Hintergrund 29 – 06 – 2018) Neue Gentechnikverfahren: zunehmende Monopolisierung von Landwirtschaft und Züchtung 2018 Hintergrund Patente & Genome Editing.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel, 2018, Scientific opinion on the assessment of genetically engineered maize MON 87403 for food and feed uses, import and processing, from Monsanto 2018 Testbiotech comment_maize_MON87403.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel, 2018, Assessment of genetically engineered cotton GHB614 x LLCotton25 x MON15985 for food and feed uses, from Bayer CropScience 2018 TBT_stacked_cotton_GHB614 x LL25 x MON15985.pdf

Publication year: 2018
Testbiotech comment on “Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-DE-2011-95) for the placing on the market of genetically modified maize 5307″ from Syngenta 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize 5307.pdf
Differences: Genome editing and mutagenesis 2018 Table_comparison CRISPR & mutagenesis_2.pdf
Unterschiede: Genome Editing und Mutagenese Testbiotech Basis-Text 2018 Tabelle Vergleich CRISPR & Mutagenese_2.pdf
Legal analysis: The genome editing technique is covered by Directive 2001/18 Comment on Advocate Bobeks Opinion in case C-528/16 Professor Ludwig Kraemer 2018 Legal dossier_GMO – genome editing_2018.pdf
Testbiotech on risk assessment of Golden Rice by FSANZ (February 2018) 2018 Testbiotech on risk assessment of Golden Rice by FSANZ_Preliminary Version.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS8, RF3 and MS8×RF3 for renewal of authorisation under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA-GMO-RX-004) 2018 TBT comment MS8 x RF3_2018.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s opinion on the assessment of genetically modified maize 1507 x 59122 x MON810 x NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2011-92) by company DowDuPont 2018 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize 1507_59122_MON810_NK603.pdf

Publication year: 2017
Factsheet – Genetic engineering and honey bees 2017 Testbiotech_factsheet_bees_genetic_engineering_2019.pdf
How can EFSA independence be strengthened? TESTBIOTECH Background 19 – 06 – 2017 2017 TBT – How to strengthen EFSA independence.pdf
Testbiotech comment on ‘Scientific Opinion on application EFSA-GMO-BE-2013-118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 x MON 89034 x 1507 x MON 88017 x 59122 and subcombinations 2017 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize MON 87427 x MON 89034 x 1507 x MON 88017 x 59122_v3.pdf
Testbiotech comment on ‘Scientific Opinion on application EFSA-GMO-BE-2013-117 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and subcombinations by Monsanto (September 2017) 2017 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 .pdf
Eingabe von Testbiotech (Juli 2017) Antwort auf den Brief des Patentinhabers vom 29.11. 2016 und die Stellungnahme der Einspruchsabteilung vom 27.01.2017 2017 Antwort auf MPG_Testbiotech.pdf
Playing Russian Roulette with Biodiversity Uncontrolled applications of gene editing threaten biodiversity, the rights of consumers and farmers, as well as the future of animal and plant breeding 2017 Russian_Roulette_with_Biodiversity.pdf
Russisches Roulette mit der biologischen Vielfalt Unkontrollierter Einsatz von Gene-Editing gefährdet die biologische Vielfalt, die Rechte von Verbrauchern und Landwirten und die Zukunft der Tier- und Pflanzenzucht 2017 Russisches_Roulette_mit_Biodiversitaet.pdf
Checking the facts: Genetically engineered soybeans from Bayer and Dow with triple resistance to herbicides (December 2017) 2017 Checking the facts_toxic soybeans_December 2017.pdf
Faktencheck: Gentechnik-Soja mit dreifacher Resistenz gegen Herbizide 2017 Faktencheck Gift-Soja Dezember 2017.pdf
Testbiotech Hintergrund: Gentechnik-Position von CDU/CSU unzureichend (04-08-2017) 2017 Testbiotech_Bewertung_Gentechnik-Position-CDU_CSU.pdf

Publication year: 2017
How can EFSA independence be strengthened? TESTBIOTECH Background 19 – 06 – 2017 2017 TBT – How to strengthen EFSA independence.pdf
Themen-Factsheet: Bienen 2017 Testbiotech_Steckbrief_Bienen_Gentechnik_2019.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel Scientific Opinion on application EFSAGMO- NL-2013-119 for authorisation of genetically modified glufosinate-ammonium and glyphosate-tolerant oilseed rape MON 88302 x MS8 x RF3 and subcombinations 2017 TBT comment MON80332 x MS8 x RF3_v2.pdf
Testbiotech Background – Glyphosate and genetically engineered plants (July2017) 2017 Testbiotech_Factsheet-Glyphosate_and_herbicide_resistant_plants-July_2017.pdf
Testbiotech-Hintergrund: Glyphosat und Gentechnik-Pflanzen (Juli 2017) 2017 Testbiotech_Factsheet-Glyphosat_und_herbizidresistente_Pflanzen-Juli_2017.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2013-120) for authorisation of genetically modified soybean FG72 x A5547-127 for food and feed 2017 TBT Comment soybean FG72 x A5547-127_02_fin_v3.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific opinion on an application by Dow AgroSciences LLC (EFSA-GMO-NL-2012-106) for the placing on the market of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant soybean DAS-44406-6 2017 TBT Comment soybean DAS-44406-6_fin_v3.pdf
Synthetische Gentechnik und CRISPR-Cas – die Risiken im Überblick Den Anwendungen der neuen Gentechnikverfahren müssen klare Grenzen gesetzt werden 2017 Testbiotech_Neue Gentechnikverfahren.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on an application by Dow AgroSciences LLC (EFSA-GMO-NL-2011-91) for the placing on the market of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant soybean DAS-68416-4 2017 TBT Comment soybean DAS-68416-4_02_fin_v3.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Scientific Opinion on an application by DOW AgroSciences LLC (EFSA-GMO-NL-2010-89) for placing on the market the genetically modified herbicide-tolerant maize DAS-40278- 9 2017 Testbiotech_Comment_Maize 40278-9.pdf

Publication year: 2017
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Scientific Opinion on an application by Dow AgroSciences (EFSA-GMO-NL-2013-116) for placing on the market of genetically modified insect-resistant soybean DAS-81419-2 2017 Testbiotech_Comment_Soybean 81419_2.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2011-96) for the placing on the market of genetically modified insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant cotton GHB119 from Bayer CropScience AG 2017 TBT Comment cotton GBH 119.pdf
Breeding material from cloned bulls in the US imported into the EU – and related current gaps in regulation 2017 Testbiotech_cloned bulls and CETA.pdf

Publication year: 2016
Testbiotech comment on draft EU Commission Directive amending Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms 2016 Testbiotech comments on proposed changes of Annexes of Directive 2001_18.pdf
Teosinte plants in the European environment and its implication for market authorisation of genetically engineered maize Legal analysis by Professor Ludwig Krämer, commissioned by Testbiotech, Germany. 2016 Teosinte_legal dossier.pdf
Cultivation of genetically engineered maize: Risks not under control Overview: Why the EU should not allow the cultivation of transgenic maize engineered to produce insecticidal toxins 2016 Reasons against cultivation of GE maize in the EU.pdf
Anbau von Gentechnik-Mais: Risiken nicht unter Kontrolle Überblick: Gründe gegen eine Anbauzulassung für transgenen, insektengiftigen Mais in der EU 2016 Gründe gegen den Anbau von Gentechnik-Mais_in der EU.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2007-47) for the placing on the market of the herbicide-tolerant, high-oleic acid, genetically engineered soybean 305423 x 40-3-2 2016 TBT Background Soybean 305423 x 40-3-2.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s Scientific Opinion on an application by Syngenta (EFSA-GMO-DE-2011-99) for the placing on the market of maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 and twenty subcombinations 2016 TBT Background Maize Bt11 x 59122 x MIR604 x 1507 x GA21.pdf
Technical dossier on the complaint against the decision of the EU Commission to give market authorisation to herbicide-tolerant genetically engineered oilseed soybeans MON 87708 × MON 89788, MON 87705 × MON 89788 and FG72 (September 2016) 2016 Technical dossier for complaint against import of toxic soybeans.pdf
Legal Dossier: On the admissibility of requests for internal review of Commission decisions which are based on Regulation 1829/2003 (August 2016) Dossier compiled by Prof Ludwig Kraemer, commissioned by Testbiotech 2016 Legal Dossier GMO – Art.10 of Reg.1367_L_Kraemer.pdf
Gentechnik, Patente und die Tierversuchsindustrie ( August 2016) Neue Gentechnik-Verfahren und Patente auf Säugetiere lassen die Zahl der Tierversuche weiter ansteigen 2016 Testbiotech_Ethik_Gentechnik-Tiere-Patente.pdf
Testbiotech report: Risks and side effects for humans and animals What really goes wrong in regulation of genetically engineered plants 2016 Risk assessment Food & Feed_Testbiotech.pdf

Publication year: 2016
Testbiotech-Bericht: Risiken und Nebenwirkungen für Mensch und Tier Was bei der Zulassung gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen wirklich falsch läuft 2016 Risikobewertung Food & Feed_Testbiotech.pdf
Testbiotech Background: The Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) and the review of glyphosate – Massive conflicts of interest (May 2016, update August 2016)) 2016 Annex_COI_JMPR_2.pdf
Testbiotech Hintergrund: Das Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues und die Bewertung von Glyphosat – Massive Interessenkonflikte (Mai 2016, Update August 2016) 2016 ANNEX_COI_JMPR_de_2.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the EFSA Scientific Opinion on an application by Dow Agrosciences LLC (EFSA-GMO-NL-2009-68) for placing on the market of cotton 281-24-236 x 3006-210-23 x MON 88913 2016 TBT Comment cotton 281-24-236 x 3006-210-23 x MON88913.pdf
Synthetic gene technologies applied in plants and animals used for food production Overview on patent applications on new techniques for genetic engineering and risks associated with these methods 2016 Gene_editing_plants_and_animals.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-DE-2009-66) for placing on the market of herbicide tolerant and insect resistant maize Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × GA21 and subcombinations 2016 TBT Comment_ Bt11_MIR162_MIR604_GA21.pdf
Gentechnik-Tiere: Risiko für Mensch und Umwelt Eine kritische Bewertung Christoph Then 2016 Risiken_Gentiere_n2.pdf
Toxicology of glyphosate, isoxaflutole, dicamba and possible combination effects Wolfgang Reuter 2016 Tox_Evaluation_Glyphosate_Dicamba_Isoxaflutole.pdf

Publication year: 2015
Gene-editing and plants & animals used in food production: some technical, socio-economic and legal aspects 2015 Legal and technical aspects genome editing_Testbiotech_.pdf
Testbiotech/Genewatch: Technical background on the request to stop the authorisation process of genetically engineered soybeans MON87708 x MON89788, FG72 and MON87705 x MON89788 for import (16-11-2015) 2015 Technical background on GE soybeans 16_11_2015.pdf
Testbiotech-Bericht: Der Einfluss der Gentechnik-Industrie auf aktuelle EU-Forschungsprojekte zu gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen (2015) 2015 Testbiotech_Bericht_GRACE_Abschluss_1.pdf
Kraemer (2015) Legal questions concerning new methods for changing the genetic conditions in plants 2015 Kraemer_Legal questions_new methods.pdf
Bericht: Die unkontrollierte Ausbreitung gentechnisch veränderter Organismen – eine Übersicht über aktuelle Fälle und neue Risiken durch die Synthetische Biologie 2015 Testbiotech_Transgene_escape_II.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on an application (Reference EFSAGMO- NL-2011-100) for the herbicide-tolerant, increased oleic acid genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2015 TBT Comment Soybean 87705 x 89788.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-BE- 2011-98) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified soybean FG72 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2015 TBT _Comment_ Soybean FG72.pdf
Testbiotech comment on an application for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2015 TBT Comment NK603 x T25.pdf
Comments to the “Scientific advice to the European Commission on the internal review submitted against the Commission Implementing Decision 2015/687 to authorise genetically modified oilseed rape MON88302” (EFSA, August 2015) 2015 Testbiotech_Analysis_EFSA_MON88032_September_2015.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Scientific Opinion on tissue-selective herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize MON 87427 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2015 Testbiotech_ Background_MON 87427.pdf

Publication year: 2015
Testbiotech comment : herbicide-tolerant genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, import and processing from Monsanto 2015 TBT Background Soja 87708 x 89788.pdf
Technical background: complaint soybean MON 87769, MON 87705, 305423 2015 Technical Dossier altered_oil_soybeans_complaint.pdf
Freihandel – Einfallstor für die Agro-Gentechnik / Auswirkungen von CETA und TTIP auf die EU-Regelungen im Bereich der Landwirtschaft – eine kritische Begutachtung 2015 Testbiotech_CETA_TTIP.pdf
»Stoppt Investitionen in Tierleid« Patente auf Tiere und neue Gentechnik-Verfahren: Gewinninteressen führen zu steigender Zahl von Tierversuchen 2015 Gentechnikmaus im Sonderangebot.pdf
Links between selected pharmaceutical companies and financial institutions A research paper prepared for TestBiotech Barbara Kuepper 2015 Links between pharma companies and FIs TestBiotech.pdf
Stress-Test für Gentechnik-Pflanzen zeigt gravierende Lücken bei Risikobewertung 2015 Testbiotech_Hintergrund_Stresstest_MON810.pdf
Der lange Arm der Industrie Einflussnahme auf Forschung und Behörden in Deutschland im Bereich Gentechnik und Lebensmittelsicherheit Andreas Bauer-Panskus & Christoph Then 2015 Langer_Arm_der_Industrie.pdf
Open letter to the Commission on new genetic engineering methods (January 2015) 2015 20150126 Open Letter on new GM technologies.pdf
Synthetische Gentechnik und ihre Anwendung bei Pflanzen und Tieren in der Landwirtschaft 2015 Testbiotech_Basis_Text_Synthetische Gentechnik.pdf
GRACE – Ausverkauf der EU-Risikoforschung an die Gentechnik-Industrie 2015 GRACE_Ausverkauf an Industrie.pdf

Publication year: 2014
Kommentar zum offenen Briefes des GRACE-Konsortiums an Testbiotech wegen eines am 7. November 2014 veröffentlichten Berichts 2014 Testbiotech Analyse des offenen Briefes von GRACE.pdf
Bewertung der GRACE-Publikation „Ninety-day oral toxicity studies on two genetically modified maize MON810 varieties in Wistar Han RCC rats (EU 7th Framework Programme project GRACE)“ 2014 Testbiotech_Zweifel an EU_Fütterungsstudie_GRACE_2.pdf
Das Versagen der EFSA bei der Risikobewertung gentechnisch veränderter Nutzpflanzen: Acht Beispiele 2014 Mängel_Riskobewertung_acht_GV_Pflanzen.pdf
Testbiotech comment on Scientific Opinion on applications (EFSA-GMO-UK-2008-57 and EFSA-GMO-RX-MON15985) for the placing on the market of insect-resistant genetically modified cotton MON 15985 from Monsanto 2014 TBT_comment_ cotton_MON15985.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the German Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) on the active ingredient glyphosate 2014 TBT_Comment_glyphosate_final.pdf
Testbiotech-Kommentar zur Risikobewertung der EFSA (EFSAGMO-BE-2011-101) zum Antrag auf Marktzulassung von herbizidresistenten, gentechnisch veränderten Rapspflanzen MON 88302 der Firma Monsanto – Kurzfassung 2014 TBT comment_MON_88302_Kurzfassung.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel Scientific Opinion on application (EFSAGMO-BE-2011-101) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302 for food and feed uses, import and processing from Monsanto 2014 TBT comment_oilseed_rape_MON_88302.pdf
Synthetische Gentechnik, Tierschutz und Patentierung – Problemdarstellung und zehn dringliche Fragen 2014 Tierschutz und Gentechnik_zehn Fragen.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2010-77) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton GHB614 x LLCotton25 for food and feed uses, import and processing from Bayer CropScience 2014 TBT_Comment_GHB614 x LL25_stacked_cotton.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-UK-2009-76) for the placing on the market of soybean MON 87769 genetically modified to contain stearidonic acid, for food and feed uses, import and processing from Monsanto 2014 TBT_Comment_MON87769_SDA_Soybean.pdf

Publication year: 2014
Gentechnik–Mais 1507: EFSA kann Kritik an Risikobewertung nicht entkräften 2014 Testbiotech_1507_Reaktion_EFSA.pdf
Einspruch gegen das Europäische Patent EP 1364025 B1 2014 Einspruch_Patent _Bionomics.pdf
Case study: Industry influence in the risk assessment of genetically engineered Maize 1507 2014 Testbiotech_ Analysis_Impact_Industry_1507_final.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL- 2009-64) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified soybean BPS-CV127-9 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2014 TBT_Comment_Soybean BPS-CV127-9_Import.pdf
Gentechnik-Mais 1507: EFSA und Industrie verschleiern tatsächliche Konzentration des Insektengifts in den Pflanzen 2014 Testbiotech_Bt_Konzentration_1507.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion of EFSA on application EFSAGMO- NL-2007-45 for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant, high-oleic acid, genetically modified soybean 305423 for food and feed uses by Pioneer 2014 TBT Comment soybean 305423_import.pdf
Golden-Rice: PR Kampagne ohne Glaubwürdigkeit 2014 Testbiotech_Golden Rice_Golden Lies_DE.pdf

Publication year: 2013
Investors being active in companies Altor BioScience (USA), Bionomics (Australia) and Intrexon (USA). 2013 List of investors.pdf
Gemeinsamer Aufruf von zwölf Organisationen an die Investoren der Firmen Altor BioScience, (USA), Bionomics (Australien) und Intrexon (USA) wegen Patenten auf gentechnisch veränderte Schimpansen 2013 Brief_Investoren_de.pdf
Synthetic Genome Technologies 2013 Stellungnahme Synthetic Genome Technologies.pdf
Transgene Escape Atlas der unkontrollierten Verbreitung gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen 2013 Testbiotech_Ausbreitung_Transgene.pdf
Hohe Rückstandsmengen von Glyphosat bei Sojabohnen in Argentinien 2013 TBT_Hintergrund_Glyphosat_Argentina.pdf
Wie gefährlich ist Glyphosat? 2013 Basistext_Glyphosat_Testbiotech_.pdf
Rechtliche Analyse: Die Freisetzung gentechnisch veränderter Organismen und das Vorsorgeprinzip Zusammenfassung eines Rechtsgutachtens von Professor Dr. Ludwig Krämer durch Testbiotech, Oktober 2013 2013 GVO und Vorsorge_Testbiotech.pdf
Transgene Escape: Gentechnisch veränderter Raps außer Kontrolle – eine globale Übersicht 2013 TBT Transgene Escape_Raps.pdf
Testbiotech comment on Scientific Opinion of EFSA on application EFSA-GMO-NL-2011-97 for the placing on the market of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton T304-40 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2013 TBT Comment_Cotton 304_40_Import_2013.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Scientific Opinion on an application from Pioneer Hi-Bred International and Dow AgroSciences LLC (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-23) for placing on the market of maize 59122 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation 2013 TBT_opinion_ 59122_Cultivation.pdf

Publication year: 2013
(DIS-)GRACE: Risikoforschung an der Leine der Gentechnik-Industrie 2013 TBT Hintergrund GRACE_final.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA GMO Panel´s Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL- 2010-87) for the placing on the market of genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape GT73 2013 TBT Comment_GT73_Import_2013.pdf
Lawsuit against the EU Commision regarding market approval for genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 2013 Testbiotech & Others v European Commission – Application for Judicial Review – 18.3.13.pdf, Testbiotech & Others v European Commission – Appendices I – III – 18.3.13.pdf, Summary – Testbiotech Others v European Commission.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA GMO-NL-2012-107) for the placing on the market of maize MON 810 pollen under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto 2013 TBT Comment _Mon810_pollen.pdf
30 years of genetically engineered plants – 20 years of commercial cultivation in the United States: a critical assessment 2013 TESTBIOTECH Cultivation_GE_ plants_US.pdf
Analysis of the data submitted by Monsanto to the Indian authorities on genetically engineered maize MON89034 x NK603 2013 TESTBIOTECH MON89034_x_NK603_application_India.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMONL- 2009-70) for the placing on the market of genetically modified drought tolerant maize MON 87460 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 2013 Comment_Mon87460_Testbiotech.pdf
SmartStax: Illegal imports of genetically engineered maize into the EU? 2013 Background_TBT_ Imports_SmartStax.pdf
SmartStax: Illegale Importe von gentechnisch verändertem Mais in die EU? 2013 Hintergrund_TBT_ Importe_SmartStax.pdf

Publication year: 2012
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Scientific Opinion on the application (EFSA GMO-NL-2010-78) for the placing on the market of herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean MON 87705 for food and feed uses, import and processing 2012 TBT comment on_Mon87705.pdf
A Playground of the Biotech Industry ? Need for reform at the European Food Safety Authority 2012 TBT Background on EFSA_Conflict of Interests.pdf
Genetically-modified insects: under whose control? 2012 Briefing genetically engineered Insects.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Panel on Scientific Opinion on application (EFSAGMO-BE-2010-81) for the placing on the market of genetically modified herbicidetolerant oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 × Rf3 for food from Bayer 2012 TBT comment_on_MS8_RF3.pdf
The European Food Safety Authority: Using double standards when assessing feeding studies TESTBIOTECH Background 30 – 10 – 2012 2012 the double standards of EFSA.pdf
EFSA: Unterschiedliche Standards bei der Bewertung von Fütterungsstudien TESTBIOTECH Hintergrund 30 – 10 – 2012 2012 die doppelten Standards der EFSA.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s draft Guidance for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered animals Testbiotech 2012 Testbiotech Comment on ERA of GE animals.pdf
Technical background for a complaint under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No. 1367/2006 against the decision of the EU Commission to give market authorisation to stacked soy MON87701 x MON89788 2012 Complaint_MON87701 x MON89788_Technical_Dossier_TBT_fin.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40-3-2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto 2012 TBT Comment_RR Soybean_40_3_2_Cultivation.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-DE-2010-82) for the placing on the market of insectresistant genetically modified maize MIR162 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta 2012 TBT Comment_MIR_162_Import.pdf

Publication year: 2012
Basistext für die Förderung unabhängiger Risikoforschung 2012 Basistext_Forschung_Testbiotech_1_dl.pdf
Basistext zu Risiken gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen 2012 Basistext_Risiko_GV-Pflanzen_Testbiotech_1_dl.pdf
Schlecht beraten: Gentechnik-Lobbyisten dominieren Expertengremium – Schwere Interessenkonflikte beim Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR) Christoph Then & Andreas Bauer-Panskus 2012 Testbiotech_Schlecht_Beraten_3.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the EU Commission’s draft for implementing regulation on applications for the authorisation of genetically modified food and feed Christoph Then 2012 TBT analysis new_EU regulation_food_and_feed.pdf

Publications

Publication year: 2011
Testbiotech comment on EFSA, 2011, Scientific Opinion on application for placing on the market of genetically modified insect resistant and herbicide tolerant maize MON 88017 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto. Christoph Then & Andreas Bauer-Panskus 2011 Testbiotech_comment_MON88107.pdf
Blacklist of European Biotech Patents 2009–2011 Christoph Then & Ruth Tippe 2011 BlackList_Patents_en.pdf
Schwarze Liste europäischer Biotech-Patente 2009–2011 Christoph Then & Ruth Tippe 2011 BlackList_Patente_de.pdf
Joint input of Testbiotech and Friends of the Earth Europe input on food derived from genetically engineered animals during consultation about “EFSA Panels on GMO and AHAW; 2011. Draft for public consultation – Scientific Opinion on the Draft Guidance on the risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified animals including animal health and welfare aspects.” 2011 Input of Testbiotech and FOE on food and feed from GE animals.pdf
„… ensured that the data were consistent with expectations…” How industry and EFSA have been systematically undermining the risk assessment of ‘SmartStax’ Christoph Then and Andreas Bauer-Panskus 2011 Testbiotech_SmartStax_en.pdf
„… wurde sichergestellt, dass die Daten den Erwartungen entsprachen…“ Industrie und Europäische Lebensmittelbehörde EFSA untergraben Risikoabschätzung beim gentechnisch veränderten Mais SmartStax Christoph Then und Andreas Bauer-Panskus 2011 Testbiotech_SmartStax_de3.pdf
Vorsicht „Giftmischer“ Gentechnisch veränderte Pflanzen in Futter- und Lebensmitteln Christoph Then 2011 Testbiotech_Giftmischer.pdf
Testbiotech comment on Selection of Comparators for risk assessment Testbiotech demands new concept for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants Christoph Then 2011 Testbiotech comment_Comparator.pdf
Testbiotech comment on EFSA´s draft Guidance for risk assessment of GMMO EFSA´s Guidance needs clarification and cut off criteria Christoph Then 2011 Testbiotech-Comment_on_GMMO.pdf

Publication year: 2010
Klonen von Nutztieren – eine ‚todsichere‘ Anwendung? Risiken und Konsequenzen des Einsatzes von Klontieren für die Lebensmittelerzeugung Then, Christoph & Tippe, Ruth 2010 Klonstudie_deutsch.pdf
Genetically engineered trees – a ticking “time bomb”? Christoph Then and Sylvia Hamberger 2010 101207_testbiotech_pappeln_en.pdf
Gentechnisch veränderte Pappeln – eine ökologische Zeitbombe? Christoph Then und Sylvia Hamberger 2010 101207_testbiotech_pappeln_de.pdf
European Food Safety Authority: A playing field for the biotech industry Standards for risk assessment massively influenced by industry Christoph Then and Andreas Bauer-Panskus 2010 EFSA_Playing_Field_of_ILSI.pdf
Europäische Lebensmittelbehörde EFSA: Spielwiese der Gen-Industrie Die Industrie beeinflusst die Standards für die Risikoprüfung gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen Christoph Then und Andreas Bauer-Panskus 2010 EFSA_ILSI_Spielwiese_.pdf
Ten crucial elements in the environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants Testbiotech 2010 Ten_crucial_elements_in_ ERA_Testbiotech.pdf
Testbiotech opinion on EFSA’s draft guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants A testbiotech report for the greens in the european parliament Christoph Then 2010 Opinion Testbiotech EFSA GMO draft guidance_2.pdf
Synthetische Biologie und künstliches Leben – eine kritische Analyse (Teil 2) Die Erzeugung und Nutzung von Biokraftstoffen der zweiten Generation („Synthi-Fuels“) Christoph Then, Christof Potthof und Sylvia Hamberger 2010 Testbiotech_Synthifuels.pdf
Synthetische Biologie und künstliches Leben – Eine kritische Analyse (Teil 1) Then, Christoph & Hamberger, Sylvia 2010 Synthetische Biologie Teil 1_7.Juni 2010.pdf
Cloning farm animals – a ´killing application´? Risks and consequences of the introduction of cloned animals for food production Then, Christoph & Tippe, Ruth 2010 Testbiotech_Cloning_2011.pdf

Publication year: 2010
Risk Reloaded Risk Analysis of Genetically Engineered Plant within the EU Then, Christoph & Potthoff, Christof 2010 risk-reloaded_engl_sc_0.pdf
New plant pest caused by genetically engineered corn The spread of the Western Bean Cutworm causes massive damage in the US Then, Christoph 2010 WBC en_27_4_2010.pdf
Gentechnisch veränderter Mais fördert Ausbreitung von Schädlingen Der Western Bean Cutworm verursacht in den USA massive Schäden Then, Christoph 2010 WBC dt_27_4_2010.pdf
Economic impacts of labelling thresholds for the adventitious presence of genetically engineered organisms in conventional and organic seed Seed Puritiy: Costs, Advantages and Risk Management for Markets avoiding Genetically Engineered Plants Then, Christoph & Stolze, Matthias 2010 IFOAM-Econimic impacts of labelling tresholds.pdf
Testbiotech opinion concerning the market application of genetically modified maize 1507 Bauer-Panskus, Andreas & Then, Christoph 2010 Opinion Testbiotech 1507 Maize engl.pdf
Stellungnahme Testbiotech zum Antrag auf Marktzulassung von gentechnisch verändertem Mais 1507 zur EFSA 2010 Stellungnahme Testbiotech 1507 Mais_korr.pdf

Publication year: 2009
Risk Reloaded Bericht zum Umgang mit den Risiken gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen in der EU Then, Christoph & Potthoff, Christof 2009 risk-reloaded_deutsch 260110.pdf

No specific year

Publication year:
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion of EFSA on application EFSA-GMO-RX-T25 and EFSA-GMO-NL-2007-4 for the placing on the market of herbicide tolerant genetically modified maize T25 from Bayer Christoph Then & Andreas Bauer-Panskus Testbiotech_Background_T25.pdf
Testbiotech comment on the Scientific Opinion on application EFSA-GMO-NL-2011-93 for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean MON 87708 from Monsanto Christoph Then TBT Background Soja 87708.pdf
High-Level-Risk-Maize 1507 (11 December 2013) Testbiotech_1507_2013_2.pdf
Free trade for ’high-risk biotech’? Testbiotech_Future_Biotech.pdf
The risks of the herbicide 2,4-D Risks of herbicide 2_4-D.pdf
How much Bt toxin do genetically engineered MON810 maize plants actually produce? Bt concentration in field plants from Germany and Spain Antje Lorch, Christoph Then How much Bt toxin produced in MON810_Greenpeace.pdf
Technical background: complaint oilseed rape MON88302 Technical Dossier complaint _oilseed rape_MON_88302.pdf
Die Einschätzung deutscher Behörden zum CIBUS-Raps ist rechtlich nicht haltbar (TESTBIOTECH Hintergrund 25-11-2015) Testbiotech Hintergrund rechtliche Bewertung Cibus_Raps.pdf